Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P4 medicine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete Spartaz Humbug! 21:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- P4 medicine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No evidence of notability Axl (talk) 09:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable, appears to be a promo for an unknown, recently invented school of alternative medicine. KleenupKrew (talk) 11:07, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. When you strip the probably mirrors of the Wikipedia articles out of a Google search, there are 75 to 150 remaining pages that contain the string "P4 Medicine". It's basically an article about one person's idea. Not a bad idea, but not a notable one, either. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:45, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —Fvasconcellos (t·c) 14:34, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Abstain. WhatamIdoing's criticism of the article, as "one man's idea" is hard to argue with. Maybe in a few years, there should be a Wikipedia article on P4 Medicine. (As an aside, calling P4 Medicine "alternative medicine" doesn't make any sense to me. Hood is about as mainstream biotech as one can get.) ErikNilsson (talk) 04:36, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.