Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Package unit (finance)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 07:08, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Package unit (finance)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Package unit (finance) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD'd a few weeks ago with "Can't find any indication this is a notable term of art in UK finance (or in general really)" as my rationale. De-PROD'd by creator with no reasoning given, and there has been no improvement or sourcing added to the article. I still can't find any indication of this being so notable that it needs a standalone encyclopedia article - not even enough mentions in situ to transwiki it to wiktionary. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:15, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:15, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:15, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

• Delete Nine years is long enough for anyone interested to demonstrate any indication of possible notability for this unsourced sub-stub. Nobody has, which says a lot. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:04, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 04:04, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

• Delete Stub article with no supporting references. Support for delete unless references can be found to substantiate notability. Oaktree b (talk) 16:17, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
• Delete, article is an unsourced stub, and I could find no references to support notability. Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:26, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.