Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Prescott
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:19, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Patrick Prescott (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Declining speedy. Unsure if this passes WP:ATHLETE. UtherSRG (talk) 09:51, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - A "up-and-coming" fighter with only two "professional" fights. Lacks GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:ATHLETE. ttonyb (talk) 18:22, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Even the creator admits that he is non-notable - "up-and-coming". Joe Chill (talk) 23:06, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Definitely fails WP:ATHLETE. --LordPistachio talk 07:05, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete May be notable someday, but not yet. Astudent0 (talk) 14:21, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.