Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Joyous! | Talk 12:05, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability was removed with the rationale, "First school of social work in Israel. One of the premier schools in the country. Center of research. It is notable." But no improvement. Currently has zero in-depth sourcing from independent, reliable secondary sources. Searches turned up mentions, but no significant in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 12:41, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the prod and I stand by my reasons. Removing a notability tag because I disagree with does not obligate me to improve it especially since I put a stub tag on it from the very beginning. Wikipedia is a collaborative site. Other people can improve the article.
BUT
Onel has a history of tagging dozens of articles and I remember very few where they give specific reasons for their opinion They have taken a few of my articles to AfD for whatever reasons and the articles were closed as keep. Perhaps one was deleted. Other editors have confronted Onel, some angrily, for being so critical. I can’t help but wonder if Onel is upset that people don’t agree with him/her.
if Onel gave specific details on why they felt the way they did and gave editors who are considered experts in education, Israel, etc appropriate time to address Onel’s legitimate issues, that would be different. Also, it would be helpful to have an editor fluent in Hebrew to help improve the article. BostonMensa (talk) 13:26, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Notability and importance are not equivalent. You've typed lots of words about importance. Got anything to say about notability? 174.212.228.145 (talk) 23:21, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.