Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Worsteling
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. postdlf (talk) 16:34, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Paul Worsteling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
promotional article; he may possible be notable as a TV presenter on fishing if it can actually be verified that his program is not just " now regarded by many as Australia’s premier fishing program, " but actually is Australia's premier fishing program as judged by some actual award, not just by nominations. Nothing else here is possibly notable; e.g. "He and his wife ... are now working to establish Tackleworld Mornington to service the needs ...." . In ordinary objective english, it translates as "he and his wife are hoping to build a notable business." DGG ( talk ) 05:43, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:08, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:09, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:09, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:11, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:30, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 17:27, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 06:41, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – Extensive Google trawling results in only one instance of coverage by a major news source and a couple instances of soft-news coverage by a local paper, essentially placing him under WP:BLP1E. I would recommend userfication, but the chances that he actually becomes notable in the next five years or so are slim. Plus, much of the article is unsourced, so there wouldn't be much to hold in reserve. Deadbeef 08:02, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete blatantly fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 07:39, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep he is the main host of a show on a major televison network (see online guide) that has been nominated for a major award (Logie Award, the (first fishing program to be nominated for that award indicates that it IS the premier fishing show in Australia). Article needs to be cleaned up and de-advertorialised, but that isn't grounds for deletion. Not everything is on google, this article from 2005 indicates that he's been hosting it for a long time. The-Pope (talk) 23:16, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:57, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.