Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokemon Mystery Dungeon 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Pokémon Mystery Dungeon#Possible sequel. WjBscribe 04:24, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pokemon Mystery Dungeon 2

Per WP:NOT - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball ^Khukri 12:16, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Pokemon Mystery Dungeon#Sequel?, or delete. --h2g2bob 12:17, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, redirect. Think outside the box 12:43, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect I'd be surprised if this doesn't happen, but an article is inappropriate until there's an official announcement and some hard facts. Redirect for now. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wait until we get some pics and some info on the game, then make an article about it. You Are Ooglay 14:40, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect until we get real confirmation, then recreate. - A Link to the Past (talk) 20:45, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as per above. Sincerely, Thrashmeister {U|T|C} 20:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge try to merge this in with the original one until more information is revealedBluebrody7 21:22, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- There is nothing to merge since there is no Pokèmon Mystery Dungeon 2 announced yet. TJ Spyke 00:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or maybe Redirect IF this game is announced, and when they are some details, then it can be created (under the correct title, the person who started it didn't even bother to spell it right). TJ Spyke 00:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~According to my Japanese-speaking friend, the scan doesn't mention anything even remotely related to Pokémon (but is rather all about Ace Combat). So Delete~~. - A Link to the Past (talk) 03:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is currently nothing truly worth mentioning of the game that isn't just speculation. --Brandon Dilbeck 04:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong, strong merge. According to Duckroll (who does the "Weekly Famitsu" threads on NeoGAF and is trustworthy), the game will be as such:
New Pokemon Mysterious Dungeon
- Second Chunsoft x Pokemon project
- Slightly different format
- There's probably be 2 versions
- Story will be enhanced
- Will support Wifi
I think that's decent enough information (for a merge). - A Link to the Past (talk) 04:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I've never heard of Duckroll (which sounds like a pseudonym to me), Weekly Famitsu, or NeoGAF, and am not sure that many would approve of them being reliable source material. --Brandon Dilbeck 06:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- You have voted twice, so I have scratched your second one. just a comment, will be from a friend of a friend type source is not the most verifiable is it? If it's a sure fire thing then your article can be written when it is launched, as at the moment it's mostly speculation. Hence my not crystal ball reasoning. ^Khukri 08:42, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - This isn't supposed to be a vote—it's supposed to be a discussion trying to reach a consensus—so I removed the strikethrough—see WP:PNSD about consensus. --Brandon Dilbeck 09:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - [1] IGN now confirms it; Also, Weekly Famitsu is a magazine in Japan who often gets exclusive scoops. - A Link to the Past (talk) 15:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    - Changing my opinion to merge, because it has no title. - A Link to the Past (talk) 15:58, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

merge yay, one english source and they can't even refer to the game series correctly (calling it "Mysterious Dungeon") there's hardly enough info to make a an article out of it. After more info has been released and it could pass WP:SS then it can be recreated/split -ΖαππερΝαππερ ^Babel_Alexandria 17:32, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Pokémon Mystery Dungeon#Possible sequel, which covers the single English-language source on this subject appropriately. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 00:48, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now. If the game becomes notable after it is released, then article can always be re-generated. 38.100.34.2 22:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The Filmaker 23:22, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.