Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powervision TV
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:12, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Powervision TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Whole article relied on a single reliable source. Fails GNG Alphaonekannan (talk) 04:11, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Alphaonekannan (talk) 04:11, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete ...and there's precious little else out there. Fails WP:GNG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 11:38, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Christianity, and Kerala. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:46, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Agreeing with nominator Onmyway22 talk 14:12, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with above, unable to find any references that establish notability. HighKing++ 21:19, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
- I've included the required citations for this topic. it is a notable television channel. It is requested to check this page and remove the deletion label. Arun Biju (talk) 10:16, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.