Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Promare

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Studio Trigger. Killiondude (talk) 05:15, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Promare

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No actual coverage of this not-yet-existing film, just coverage of the announcement. Way WP:TOOSOON for a Wikipedia article; for all we know the film may not be notable when it comes out. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:46, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - WP:TOOSOON. Meatsgains^(talk) 03:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 12:10, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 12:11, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'd previously prodded this and it had been deprodded by Narutolovehinata5. As far as I can establish the only information available about the film at this point is the announcement. It is WP:TOOSOON, per WP:NFF. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:29, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:41, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Kommentar @Anachronist: @Meatsgains: @Curb Safe Charmer: @AngusWOOF: Considering it will probably become notable anyway soon and will probably be released soon, would a redirect to Trigger (company) be an acceptable alternative to deletion? Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 22:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That'd be fine. Also move to Draft. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:11, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree that "it will probably become notable anyway." We can't make WP:CRYSTAL assumptions like that. Either it's notable, or it isn't. I have no objection to a redirect, though. If that's agreeable to you, go ahead and do that and we can close this discussion. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:26, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I support a redirect for the time being. Meatsgains^(talk) 02:06, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not contesting that we probably don't need the page yet - after all, there's no information about it to write - but it isn't a film, and I'm not sure why this deletion page seems to think it is. 67.168.85.228 (talk) 22:14, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The subject is described as an "anime project". Whether that is a film or a TV show or an OVA to be released on DVD, it doesn't really matter, they amount to the same thing. ~Anachronist (talk) 01:22, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. You're right, it doesn't matter to this. However, I still found it strange that this deletion page insistently referred to it as a film and categorized it as such, so I thought I'd say something. 67.168.85.228 (talk) 06:02, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Studio Trigger for the time being. This could have been done unilaterally and I doubt anyone would have objected. —Xezbeth (talk) 17:57, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.