Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Protane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 23:59, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Protane

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Generic version of Pantene. No sources, no links, no notability. Louiedog (talk) 03:48, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 03:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non-notable generic store brand, rumors or no. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 06:47, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question What criteria are we using to determine inclusion/deletion?--UnQuébécois (talk) 12:35, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In the absence of a specific notability guideline, I assume we would refer to WP:GNG.

Delete. Couldn't find substantive coverage in independent sources in accordance with WP:GNG, which requires more than trivial mentions. NTox · talk 16:51, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Topic appears to fail Wikipedia's General notability guideline. Not finding coverage in reliable sources for this topic. Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:15, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.