Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purdey Fitzherbert
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:41, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- Purdey Fitzherbert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Struggling to find independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:BIO and WP:NARTIST. Run-of-the-mill artist. Promotional article. Edwardx (talk) 13:38, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 14:53, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 14:54, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 14:54, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 14:54, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Seems to be PROMO (with an artist's statement) and has insufficient sourcing. May be a fanpage. Agricola44 (talk) 17:27, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as it has been up for 5 years and still there isn't any sourcing that I could find. Just gallery representation, which isn't enough. --Theredproject (talk) 02:08, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete--yeah, pity, but I can't find anything helpful either. Drmies (talk) 02:10, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete inadequate sourcing in article, and nothing turns up in search.198.58.161.137 (talk) 12:08, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.