Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raja Madat Khan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:46, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Raja Madat Khan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing significant. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 11:19, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 13:17, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 13:17, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 22:44, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete totally unsourced. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:48, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative searches:

name and modifier: (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

name: (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Löschen In a case like this leaving out the title Raja could maybe prove useful, so I tried the above alternative searches. I found no book sources on Madat Khan|Bratla or Madat Khan|Koi, which surprises me. There is a whole lot on Madat Khan alone, but I can't figure out which, if any, are relevant to this person, and which are false positives. I can't even figure out when this person lived. Could there be sources in Urdu? Could an editor with more familiarity with the subject area do a better job? As it is now, it fails WP:V. Delete per WP:DEL7. Sam Sailor 09:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.