Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph Barlow (priest)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There is agreement that the subject meets WP:ANYBIO#3 by virtue of an entry in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:26, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ralph Barlow (priest)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

None of this is substantial coverage; bishops are presumed notable, but not Deans. DGG ( talk ) 09:41, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Previous discussions about archdeacons

Bashereyre (talk) 10:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:27, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:27, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:27, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I'm not sure why you included the list of other discussions, but I looked at the first three and the results were all "keep". St Anselm (talk) 21:46, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's more helpful to look at all of them 7 are keep, 4 delete, 2 redirect, so thee isi clearly no consensus to keep as a matter of course. DGG ( talk ) 11:35, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep has an entry in the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography Piecesofuk (talk) 18:20, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Piecesofuk. St Anselm (talk) 01:05, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. DNB bio = notable per WP:ANYBIO #3. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:53, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Necrothesp:Yes! St Anselm (talk) 23:25, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, in ODNB. While WP:BEFORE doesn't require checking the Wikidata item to find sources, it clearly should, these days. Charles Matthews (talk) 10:33, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.