Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renee Whitney

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 22:42, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Renee Whitney (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This actress may have appeared in 53 films, but was uncredited in all but a handful of them and was somewhat low in the billing order, e.g. Footlight Parade. She doesn't satisfy WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:26, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent)|lambast 05:39, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent)|lambast 05:39, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (say) @ 20:20, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - quantity of acting does not mean quality nor notability. The "Studios" had many actresses who had passing roles in dozens of films. Bearian (talk) 00:15, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — kikichugirl oh hello! 05:20, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not a notable actress in the encyclopedic sense editors could look at improving the IMDB page if they wanted to go extracurricular but the subject isn't notable for wikipedia. Bryce Carmony (talk) 11:12, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.