Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rex D. Pinegar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:24, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rex D. Pinegar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable subject that does not meet WP:BASIC, as per WP:BEFORE source searches to determine the depth of coverage the subject has received in independent, reliable sources. Said searches are only providing minor passing mentions, name checks and quotations, none of which establish notability. No significant coverage appears to exist about the subject in said necessary sources. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:08, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:08, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:09, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:09, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per norm. I can only find minor passing mentions.Tamsier (talk) 16:41, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dunno. this one may just need an editor willing to expand, source it. He get cited in scholarly literature, and there are quite a few hits in gBooks, mostly books of LDS pietism and memoir, search with and some without the middle initial. E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:06, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Atlantic306 (talk) 14:27, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.