Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard-Lael Lillard
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:47, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Richard-Lael Lillard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable individual. Could find no coverage beyond a passing mention in a Pasadena Weekly article. PK650 (talk) 04:54, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:31, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:32, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:33, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete does not pass WP:NACTOR with minor roles only at this point, and a lack of significant reliable sources coverage for WP:GNG in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- Weak Delete: The subject only has one role which would go towards WP:NACTOR, and there doesn't appear to be enough coverage to meet WP:GNG, either. I found this article, but it wouldn't qualify as a reliable source: http://thebaybridged.com/2016/10/11/review-photos-bloody-misfit-cabaret-great-star-theater/. However, because I give no opinion as to whether he is notable in his other professions, I am qualifying my "delete" vote as "weak". Dflaw4 (talk) 12:56, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.