Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Glenn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 15:35, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Glenn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable MMA fighter - few fights, none top tier. Peter Rehse (talk) 09:27, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 09:27, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete At this point he fails WP:NMMA since he has no top tier fights. Papaursa (talk) 19:54, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep On the contrary, with some basic research via Sherdog and the World Series of Fighting website I found out that this fighter is currently the featherweight champion of a top tier promotion, which according to WP:MMANOT actually passes criteria, although the user who created this article should of finished the job in my opinion. Perhaps instead of deleting this article it should simply 'completed'. I will aim to finish the fighter's win/loss record if someone would like to volunteer to work on his background and gather sources for future verification? 109.144.181.38 (talk) 16:04, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually he is not. WP:MMANOT lists what are considered the top tier organizations and he has yet to fight for any of them.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:11, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He currently has had no fights that qualify as top tier so he fails WP:NMMA. Mdtemp (talk) 17:55, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.