Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Craven

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 20:50, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Craven

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prodded on the grounds of failing the general notability guideline and the notability guideline for authors but deprodded by an SPA. In fact, it has been primarily maintained by a few SPAs/part-SPAs. There is a forest of references, but most of them seem to be either blogs or Craven's own work, making the article quite self-promotional. Can't see any sign of substantial coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. Claret Ash 13:09, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. No sign of substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:42, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:14, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:27, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for lack of secondary sources. Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:BK and reads like WP:ADVERT. Qworty (talk) 20:14, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.