Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romina Rocamonje

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 17:37, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Romina Rocamonje

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One more non-notable beauty pageant title holder. damiens.rf 18:19, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The only real issue is whether there is enough coverage right now to sustain an individual article or if this should become a redirect to the Miss Bolivia article, and that's not an AFD matter. It looks like there are individual articles for the last ten or so national titleholders, so it's reasonable to expect the same level of coverage for the current titleholder will develop, even if it's not out there yet. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 19:05, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bolivia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural keep - as Hullabaloo says, there is precedent for articles on national title holders who rperesent their country at a definitely significant pageant like Miss Universe. It's certainly not one of the trashy little pageants only promoted by promoters on here. Mabalu (talk) 15:43, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I agree with keep comments above, I added an additional source, and I found sufficient RS coverage in Spanish so in my opinion it meets WP:GNG.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 16:28, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.