Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Radziner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 12:55, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ron Radziner

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

partial promotional duplicate of Marmol Radziner DGG ( talk ) 18:05, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:47, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:47, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable architect. --Micky (talk) 02:10, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Blocked sockpuppet Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:37, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge >Marmol Radziner, where bio of founder would be appropriate.07:31, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
Move to draft. As far as I can recall, there was mention of a significant award that was removed from the article on the firm because it was about this subject as an individual, not the firm. If that can be tracked down and properly sourced, the subject probably meets WP:ARCHITECT, but this certainly doesn't belong in mainspace until that question is resolved, and the article is generally improved. BD2412 T 15:45, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Noting the "keep" votes below, I would change my !vote to keep if it is apparent that the improvements suggested will be implemented in the article. BD2412 T 03:38, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Does Radziner qualify to have an individual article outside of the firm? I believe he does. It comes down to significant coverage in reliable sources and if they are about him or the firm. There are many about him alone but it is hard to find as they are buried in articles about the firm. Here are some LA Mag, New York Times, Architectural Digest, Southbay, Curbed LA. I am in the middle of studies and don't have time to fully update the article with these so if it is going to be removed, please move it to draft so I can work on it when I am finished with exams. --RTotzke (talk) 03:43, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:43, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:30, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - there appear to be many print sources where Ron Radziner is the primary topic (him specifically and not Marmol Radziner) (e.g. [1] [2]) also his separate notability as a board member of the Mojave Desert Land Trust ([3] [4]) which would be an awkward inclusion in an article in the firm. --Prosperosity (talk) 02:31, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:13, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.