Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rony Tan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:21, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rony Tan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was sort of inevitable. Nommed for A7 (by me) when it was a four-line stub, previously deleted, nommed for G12 late last year, this is an article about a totally non-notable person, who once achieved limited coverage for saying some daft and mildly unpleasant things. Fails WP:GNG let alone anything else. Now off to nominate Lighthouse Evangelism, too - his 'church'. Note Reuters blog as a source, Straits Times is a 'mirror' to 'Buddhist Door' which appears to misrepresent ST as a source (it doesn't link). Basically bunkum and cruft. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:49, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:49, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:49, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTNEWS, no lasting notability. I also wonder if the extensive quoting of his comments constitute a copyright violation. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 11:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:51, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment However subject seems notable but lack of reliable references which are independent of the subject. GermanKity (talk) 02:26, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 22:36, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.