Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russian Kaleidoscope
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to C31 Melbourne. Liz Read! Talk! 03:16, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Russian Kaleidoscope (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2022 DonaldD23 talk to me 20:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Television, and Russia. DonaldD23 talk to me 20:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 20:19, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I have not been able to find any substantial coverage in secondary sources. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 14:32, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:23, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 19:08, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete My own search came up with only 1 gnews hit. Fails GNG. LibStar (talk) 20:12, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to C31 Melbourne which does have a sentence about this program. Not notable enough to have a stand alone article though. Jenks24 (talk) 21:26, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.