Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Gruhn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 05:00, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Gruhn

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable martial artist does not meet WP:MANOTE. Very (self?) promotional with ref bombing of trivial, distantly or unrelated. All competitions are low level. PRehse (talk) 13:17, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. PRehse (talk) 13:18, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:23, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:23, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep his loss to a white belt got coverage at multiple independent BJJ related publications and coverage of his coaching work in schools means he's over the WP:BLP1E and WP:SUSTAINED bars. He meets WP:GNG which supersedes WP:MANOTE and the poor quality of the article in its current form is not valid grounds for deletion. Simonm223 (talk) 14:33, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All those articles from schools he's connected to do not add to his notability. As for the video of his "loss" to a white belt, either he's a terrible black belt or he was just giving her a chance to practice her skills--much like I've seen many adult instructors do when teaching children or less skilled adults. Papaursa (talk) 17:26, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't see that he meets any of the notability criteria for martial artists and I don't believe the coverage meets WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 17:26, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 00:38, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable according to criteria. Legacypac (talk) 02:40, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
delete There are a lot of references listed, but they don't meet the significant independent coverage in reliable sources standard. Also doesn't seem to meet the notability standards for martial artists.Sandals1 (talk) 15:48, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.