Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S.D. Gopinath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 02:57, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

S.D. Gopinath

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nez Zealand businessman. No references are provided in the article and I could find nothing of note on the web. (the search is complicated by the existence of another SD Gopinath who appears to be a biologist with a few publications) I think he falls well short of the general notability criterion. Pichpich (talk) 20:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Pichpich (talk) 20:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Pichpich (talk) 20:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Pichpich (talk) 20:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Self-promotional. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 21:06, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Definitely self-promotional, not written from a neutral POV, and fails WP:BIO. Harland Q Pitt 22:59, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Purely promotional article that fails WP:GNG. Elms^super 01:50, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No notability whatsoever. Schwede 66 15:01, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete another in an extremely long line of articles on non-notable businesspeople.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:07, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no indication of notability.Faizal batliwala (talk) 14:14, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seemingly self-promotional.Deathlibrarian (talk) 00:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.