Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabahad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete per WP:N and WP:V. Also possible WP:HOAX. PeterSymonds (talk) 15:52, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sabahad

Looks like a hoax. Google for sabahad martial arts turns up nothing. BradV 17:24, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete : As per nom. --SkyWalker (talk) 17:32, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete Hoax or something made up at the dojo one day. I like how the article points out it's "mostly used for real fights". Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Almost certainly a hoax. Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 19:40, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as either a hoax or something that cannot at this time meet our notability or verifiability guidelines. I tried a few searches and turned up nothing and usually I am able to at least verify the topic's existence. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 22:06, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:16, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete The topic may exist or may be a hoax. Anyway Somalia has been in a state of civil war with little chance of verifiying the subject. Artene50 (talk) 01:56, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Almost certainly a hoax. JJL (talk) 02:05, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Almost certainly a hoax if real Not notable. --Nate1481(^t/_c) 08:40, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No evidence it's a hoax, but no sign of notability whatsoever. I've had a couple of students come into dissertation committee and earn a good tossing. Maybe the creator of this article could teach my assistant? - Mdsummermsw (talk) 18:28, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.