Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacred Heart Church, Bangalore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Dratify‎. A note to the article creator: If you bypass AFC and move this back to main space with clean-up and approval, I predict it will not be draftified again, it will simply be deleted. This is your second chance, don't be in a hurry or it's likely this article won't ever be part of the main space encyclopedia. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sacred Heart Church, Bangalore

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no independent coverage in a BEFORE, all existing sources are passing mentions in primary and tertiary refs. microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 17:06, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy ping @The Herald, User4edits, and TheBritinator: who all left comments on the draft article that existed in the mainspace prior to the AfC cleanup. microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 17:11, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I see that the user @Ashokpillai34 has moved the article into mainspace bypassing AfC submission. Therefore DRAFTIFY with appropriate information to the user. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 17:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify: (Responding to the courtesy ping as the last AfC reviewer who declined the draft) The article is still in no way for mainspace. Since the last decline, it hasn't improved per se. Still need extensive cleanup, and more independent reliable sources for verifiability and GNG. Also, I'd like to urge the editor to submit it via AfC and not to bypass the procedure. Yes, we have a backlog of 7 weeks, but if your article is upto the mark, it will be published nevertheless. A few weeks is not going to change anything. Bypassing the AfC is not acceptable and is totally unfair to other drafts that are awaiting review. Also, it is under disruptive editing. Thanks and happy editing. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 17:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have already draftified this article once, and the author has taken it upon themselves to ram it through to mainspace once again. Good day—RetroCosmos ^talk 21:55, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The said user had previously done the same on 12 February 2024. User4edits (talk) 04:02, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think if this keeps going on, a block is in order. Good day—RetroCosmos ^talk 15:11, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As the nom, for the sake of consensus, I would also support draftify. If moved back to the draftspace, the previous comments and declination reasons should be added back in. microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 18:03, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Though I do not believe it is notable at the moment and any existing article could reach that threshold at this time. If it were to be draftified, it should require approval from an AfC reviewer and not be allowed to be moved back to mainspace, given the article history raised by other commentors here. microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 13:54, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Christianity and Karnataka. Shellwood (talk) 18:14, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dont delete it guys. please approve it Ashokpillai34 (talk) 05:24, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

respectfully, with every AfC submission (10!) and multiple attempts at ramming to mainspace you are straying closer and closer to WP:CIR territory. I strongly suggest you take a read at the rejection rationale and the guidelines surrounding them. Good day—RetroCosmos ^talk 15:27, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.