Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Crossed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:21, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Crossed

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable boxer. Fails WP:NBOX with just two fights. Only claim to fame appears to be appearing in a local TV commercial with Mike Tyson, but that's WP:BLP1E and WP:NOTINHERITED. Certainly not enough to meet WP:GNG. Mdtemp (talk) 17:25, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 19:20, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 19:20, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 19:22, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable. 71.185.45.31 (talk) 01:00, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't meet the notability criteria for boxers and lacks the significant coverage required to meet WP:GNG. A local TV ad is insufficient to show notability. Papaursa (talk) 00:03, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per nominator.Peter Rehse (talk) 12:39, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.