Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sama Raena Alshaibi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as withdrawn as the collections listed at the website such as the national or state museums are sufficient (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 23:06, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sama Raena Alshaibi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I frankly would've PRODed but chances are that will be removed.... No permanent collections and frankly still nothing actually suggestive here aside from the apparently only best claim, a Scholar award; my own searches have simply still not found nothing anything else better. SwisterTwister talk 19:10, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 19:20, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Nothing suggestive? Photographers may dream of (like Diane Arbus) having a book published by the Aperture Foundation; this photographer (or artist) has achieved it. She's also been exhibited with other unusually noteworthy photographers (example). As for collections, there's quite a long list in her resume. No, the latter is of course not a RS for such a claim, but have you tried and failed duckduckgoing for additional evidence for these collections? -- Hoary (talk) 22:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.