Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sblounskched!
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:40, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Sblounskched! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A one off joke from the Homestar Runner website that has absolutely zero notability whatsoever. There are no reliable sources for this at all. The only source provided in the article is a wiki, which of course, is not a reliable source. The article was PRODed, as it should have been, but the article creator removed the PROD, for no real reason that I can discern. Rorshacma (talk) 05:42, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per my initial PROD and nominator's comments. Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 12:01, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:19, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:19, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Can't even call this prime redirect material. tutterMouse (talk) 12:00, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Lacks notability. Geoff Who, me? 01:14, 8 July 2012 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.