Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sckoropad Twins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:19, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sckoropad Twins

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ANYBIO. Little coverage in independent, reliable sources. DrStrauss talk 19:02, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:38, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:38, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:30, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable entertainers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:13, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG. -- Dane ^talk 18:35, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, notability is not established, and several of the references/links provided are either dead or 404. PK T(alk) 19:30, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. They'd probably qualify for an article if it could be properly sourced — but nearly all of the sources here are primary, and the two that are actually reliable source coverage about them in media independent of them don't represent enough coverage to get them over WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 14:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.