Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scooping
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete, complete bollocks. Guy (Help!) 09:38, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I speedied this earlier today but the author's made a potentially valid point on Talk:Scooping - since I've not got the knowledge to expand/cite it and s/he doesn't appear to be doing so I'm AfD'ing to give the 5 days to clean it up or provide material to clean it up. As I say on the talk page, if the author can provide sources I'll happily expand the article myself and request the AfD be withdrawn. Since (on User_talk:Sarahpw4444) the author says "I'm a semi-vandal too. Not so much the "obvious" stuff, just little bits here and there.", my hopes aren't that high, and I look forward to a week of reverting vandalism to my talk page... Iridescenti 22:47, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an unattributed neologism or possibly a hoax, that even if it were a common phrase, would probably fall under Wikipedia is not a dictionary. By the nature of the word, a Google search is tough, but searching "scooping nipples "bean dip"" finds nothing relevant.[1]. Not even an entry at urbandictionary [2]. Awaiting sourcing with unbated breath and hoping Iridescenti (and I) won't need too big a shovel.--Fuhghettaboutit 23:02, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - nonsense entry. Article was nominated for speedy by Iridescenti but article's creator removed the speedy tag.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.