Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott and Casey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:31, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Scott and Casey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced article about a radio show which may or may not pass WP:NMEDIA (it makes claims — e.g. syndication — which might qualify it, but they aren't verifiable without proper reliable sourcing.) I'd be willing to withdraw this if the sourcing improves, but it can't keep an unsourced version. Delete. Note also the redirects from the individual hosts, Scott Hasick and Casey Bartholomew, which will also need to be deleted if this goes — and Bartholomew will also have to be watched for WP:COI, as the subject has been trying to overwrite it with an WP:AUTOBIO. Bearcat (talk) 07:21, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no references, no notability. LaMona (talk) 03:32, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:30, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:30, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:30, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Short-lived, non-notable radio program. --MelanieN (talk) 18:36, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.