Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Wei Mah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The sources proposed by CrazyBoy826 are indeed clearly unreliable. Sandstein 17:19, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Wei Mah

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I tagged this article as having no reliable sources about six and a half years ago, and there has been no improvement since. I have found nothing in reliable sources on which to base a BLP. Kinu ^t/_c 22:38, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:42, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alberta-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:42, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:10, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the patience we showed with not at all reliably sourced articles on actors is truly amazing. There is no reason to have an article with 0 reliable sourced for 13 years.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:02, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak Keep~~ Weak Delete: The subject's roles in Frontier (2016 TV series), It Waits and Dreamkeeper, which seem to be relatively notable productions, may be enough for WP:NACTOR. WP:GNG, however, is the more salient issue. If no one is able to locate any sources, I will revise my vote. Dflaw4 (talk) 09:15, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I am downgrading my vote because none of the sources found below satisfy WP:GNG, in my opinion. If someone can find some, I'll happily change my vote back. Dflaw4 (talk) 00:43, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, dibbydib (T ･ C) 05:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the sources found Courrecx (talk) 05:02, 28 April 2020 (UTC) Courrecx is a checkuser-confirmed sockpuppet and has been blocked indefinitely. --Kinu ^t/_c 18:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is just a link to a Google query, which was part of the WP:BEFORE for this nomination. What specific sources are there in the results? --Kinu ^t/_c 07:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep this is notable and could be improved.[1][2][3][4][5] CrazyBoy826 (talk) 00:29, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely none of those links are to WP:RS. --Kinu ^t/_c 00:44, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.