Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seattle Film Critics Society

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seattle Film Critics Society

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No demonstration of notability. Only links to organization itself. WikiProject Film has deleted several articles about non-notable regional film-critics groups. Tenebrae (talk) 21:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 January 21. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Despite it only being formed in 2016, it has garnered significant coverage in various reliable, independent and secondary sources. - Brojam (talk) 23:24, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's cool, but there's no indication of that whatsoever in the article. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:36, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've added sources. - Brojam (talk) 05:39, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Lots of hits on Google for the society itself and the members have some notability also. We don't need to list every nom by the group though. Needs improvement. Alaney2k (talk) 16:34, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It requires improvements but I vote for the Keep. '"Xargov'" 17:05, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the article has been improved by the addition of reliable sources, passes WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 18:41, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.