Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Select-O-Hits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Closed with no prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 22:24, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Select-O-Hits

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I fail to see how this passes WP:CORP; upon prodding it, I noticed that the account responsible for this is Selecto, which I reckon may have a conflict of interest. Laun chba ller 19:07, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:01, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:01, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:01, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 04:17, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I can honestly say, with a straight face, that this is the only AfD I have ever participated in on my own. Gene93k and Courcelles, what do you think?--Laun chba ller 08:35, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This might be an article that was done by someone related to the label but the label itself is really quite important and dates back through Sun Records and Sam Phillips. It is a label that carries a lot of artists and ones important to Southern rock and Black American music. Maybe you need to suggest the article be revamped a little(?), there should be an article that pertains to the label though. Shelyric (talk) 21:23, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:21, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.