Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sentimental Rhythms

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Well, if there is "not enough information" it's difficult to justify an article. No redirect per Sam Sailor's rationale. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:39, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sentimental Rhythms

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the artist and producer are notable, this seems a CRYSTAL case with absolutely no reliable sources available that discuss the mixtape significantly. The mixtape does not seem to clear either the WP:GNG or WP:FUTUREALBUM thresholds. Lourdes 19:48, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Happy2018! (distænt write) 21:31, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Happy2018! (distænt write) 21:31, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Benzino – the article is so poorly written it's not even clear if the mixtape exists or not... the article calls it "fictitious" but it does appear to have been recorded and is even available to download illegally. Doesn't appear to be any sourcing at all apart from an audio interview with Benzino, although it's not clear where it was recorded. Without any form of official release or even a track listing, it's impossible to say that this passes WP:NALBUM. Richard3120 (talk) 00:19, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have a wonderful idea to you. Go to your phone, check if you have Benzino's actual number, actual contact information, because you unfortunately you do not. I have worked with Benzino on and off for three years. I have been helping him with pushing music and social media marketing for his ventures. Unfortunately, because there is too little information for individuals like yourself, who consider with a closed mind, should be evaluating on the basis of the individual you are referring to. Do not make me the scapegoat because you information is not accurate. So called "contributors" and "scholars" like yourselves did not even know that Benzino was featured on three albums and five mixtape, which I have added onto that page. If you want my details and feed of conversation I have had with him, email me, I will be more than welcome to provide that to you, because I am not fond of individuals who make presumptuous arguments on the basis of information they did not even bother to research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tejsodhi (talk • contribs) 18:20, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tejsodhi Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a blog or gossip website. It requires sources from published, reliable entities, not personal knowledge. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:50, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You accuse us of not having done the research, and in the same paragraph admit that there is "too little information" available for us to be able do that research... which is tantamount to admitting that the mixtape is not notable enough for an encyclopedia. Maybe you have access to personal information but WP:IKNOWIT is not acceptable as a reliable independent source... and as you admit to helping Benzino market and promote his music, you are not an independent source. Richard3120 (talk) 23:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:DEL7 as unverifiable. I get 18 non-repeated hits on a search for Benzino "Sentimental Rhythms", none of them are reliable. The article basically amounts to a few snippets of supposedly inside information by a declared COI editor. Sentimental Rhythms is currently not mentioned in Benzino, and it should not be, as long as no WP:RS exist to confirm it. As such, the title is not a valid search term, therefore a suggested policy-based WP:ATD-R solution as a categorized {{R from album}} to the artist article is here out of the question. Sam Sailor 14:31, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.