Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seun Osigbesan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:39, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seun Osigbesan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article of this Nigerian actress, totally fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Created by a single-purpose account who just registered 6 days ago and appears to be close to the subject. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 19:48, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 19:48, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 19:48, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 19:48, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:14, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I am the editor of the Nigerian actress Seun Osigbesan's article and first of all i'll like to state that I am in no way related or close to the subject in question, neither have we had any contact with each other. I am an independent editor, although i just joined wikipedia about a week ago. The subject in question is a Nigerian actress whom has a large fanbase both online and offline, has featured in more than one notable movie and two notable TV series and has played major roles as WP:NACTOR states. And she deserves a wikipedia article because she meets at least one of the criterion as a notable figure by wikipedia standards in WP:NACTOR and if a google search is made about her, articles and pages from multiple reliable sources according to wikipedia standards of WP:RS. Further more, all suggestions for edits will be taken into account, and the article will be re-edited and more reliable sources will be added. I also urge other editors to make reasearches on the subject and help improve the page. --VictorHB (talk) 20:31, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@VictorHB: It's not enough just to assert that her movies and series are "notable", you need to show that they are: create articles on them, which have good enough sources to convince editors that they are indeed notable in Wikipedia terms. PamD 09:55, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Nnadigoodluck, couldn’t have said it any better. Subject of article is a non notable actress falling short of every known notability criteria for inclusion & creator of article definitely has a COI with subject of his article Celestina007 (talk) 20:46, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The subject fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Only one of the article's sources are reliable; however, it is not independent of the subject and cannot be used to establish notability. A Google search of the subject doesn't show in-depth coverage. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 15:27, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As an actress, I'm afraid the subject doesn't meet the notability standards. I have no opinion on whether she is a notable public speaker or influencer. Dflaw4 (talk) 12:59, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.