Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seven Shadows

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Being bold given the articles PROD history. Missvain (talk) 21:40, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seven Shadows

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 11:51, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 11:51, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 11:51, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A clear PROD case; doesn't provide context for the reader to even understand what it's about. – sgeureka ^t•c 13:24, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article is written entirely in-universe. The opening suggests this is real, at least it is less than explicit that they are fictional. This could be fixed, but there is no sourcing to show they are notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:29, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this almost looks like an abandoned draft, but it says short-lived, making me think they knew it was done. Not notable. -2pou (talk) 14:38, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Apparently, I PRODed this nearly nine years ago, and then never bothered following up with an AFD after the PROD was contested. In the near-decade since then, nothing has changed regarding this so-called team. They are ridiculously minor, appearing, if I recall correctly, in a brief flashback of a single issue of a comic. There is nothing to indicate that there are any sources regarding them at all, let alone enough to pass the WP:GNG. Rorshacma (talk) 16:39, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.