Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shanti Community Animation Movement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:29, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shanti Community Animation Movement

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seem to fail WP:GNG, article supported by dead links and unsuitable sources (YouTube fails WP:RS) The Banner talk 16:53, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 19:56, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 19:56, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Of the nine references, number 3,5,8 are now dead but the other six are alive and together show notability. Also, please add to these one which updates number 3 on foreign volunteers; this which shows the natinal army's collaboration with the school; Italians lending assistance; The "European Culture Foundation" organized a charity concert at Schloss Nörvenich.... The benefit of the charity concert will be donated to the Christian charity project "Shanti".; Lund University on reconciliation in post-war Sri Lanka; and this; and this, all independent of Shanti and showing its opngoing relevance in post-war Sri Lanka. Jzsj (talk) 20:14, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jzsj: Are you aware of this group's Sinhalese or Tamil language name? — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 21:42, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, I have not found those languages used in the web articles, which is the sole resource for all my information on this organization (as on virtually all others). Jzsj (talk) 23:10, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-Not a single source (other than opinion pieces/columns) covers the subject any significantly.Willing to change shall regional sources be located.∯WBG^converse 09:11, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no third party sources. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 11:31, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks the third party, reliable independent sourcing in multiple publications that is necessary to establish notability.96.127.243.251 (talk) 08:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. There are no sources of which one can speak. Most are primary ones, and at least two are dead, may they rest in peace. Someone's pulling our leg, perhaps, and I do not approve of anyone, especially priests, pulling my leg. -The Gnome (talk) 13:11, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I repeat, for about the 6th time, that I was deceived by the reviewers who passed my development centre articles with hardly ever a tag!!! From their ready acceptance of the articles I came in the end to follow the principle that what was required was that the institute/organization had at least a regional impact and at least one citation that was not directly connected to the organization. As to expecting greater sanctity from priests, the Catholic Second Vatican Council of Bishops, in the 1960s, decreed that lay persons are called to the same sanctity of life as priests and religious, and this was reiterated in Pope Francis' exhortation Gaudete et exsultate of last spring. Jzsj (talk) 14:06, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.