Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaolin-Do (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:50, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Shaolin-Do

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable martial art. The only sources that directly talk about this art are primary - the rest are essentially piggy backing. The art itself is not particularly widespread and (according to forums) is more notorious than notable. Search is difficult since this is not the more famous Shaolin. Peter Rehse (talk) 18:13, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 18:13, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is no significant coverage in independent sources and nothing to show it meets any criteria at WP:MANOTE. Papaursa (talk) 18:19, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there's still nothing here at all for any applicable notability, there are sources but still nothing actually suggesting solid independent notability as a school. SwisterTwister talk 06:24, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No real claim of notability and no significant independent coverage. Also fails WP:MANOTE. Existing is not the same as notable.Mdtemp (talk) 16:25, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SNOW. Let's get this over with, folks. Bearian (talk) 16:49, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.