Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherman Harrill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 18:40, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sherman Harrill

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested as this article was deleted via PROD in 2006. It was never undeleted but was recreated independently in 2008, so IMO it should still be eligible, but whatever.

Original PROD reasoning: This person is not notable per WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. None of the references in the article are independent or reliable. I searched extensively on Google, Google Books, Google News, Highbeam, and Newspapers.com and found nothing but trivial mentions at best.

PROD was endorsed by Mr. Guye with the reasoning: Really seems promising when you research him until you realize that none of the sources you are finding are independent. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:41, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:38, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:21, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 19:09, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 19:10, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I stand by my Proposed deletion endorsement. No significant coverage in WP:INDY. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 19:15, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:37, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:MANOTE. There's no indication of any notability as a martial artist and there's also a lack of significant independent coverage. Papaursa (talk) 00:11, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.