Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shmoney Shmurda

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bobby Shmurda. There's clearly consensus against keeping, but there's not full consensus for delete+redirect. It should, however, be considered a hard redirect and therefore probably should not be restored without clearly demonstrating WP:NALBUM. slakrtalk / 07:26, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shmoney Shmurda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable mixtape. Fails WP:GNG. Koala15 (talk) 18:29, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:18, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Kudpung: Why specifically "delete and redirect"? Can't the current version simply be preserved for future uses rather than recreated again? SwisterTwister talk 05:24, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Lots of reasons: it's short and can be easily recreated;it's probably unlkely to achieve notability in the near future; it's one of the available standard AfD closure criteria; Some genres of musicians are notorious fro blatantly ubdoing redirects. But perhaps I should have probably voted for outright deletion, but I'll stick with deletion leaving a redirect for now. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:47, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
SwisterTwister, a move is not technically possible because an article of that name with valid content already exists. What I think you mean is 'redirect'. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:08, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, slakrtalk / 11:01, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.