Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shrine of Our Lady of the Prairies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Powers Lake, North Dakota, given the weight of the commentary from the non-SPA accounts. –MuZemike 17:40, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shrine of Our Lady of the Prairies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this church. Joe Chill (talk) 00:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Even a cursory browse of Google reveals plenty of noteworthy stories about the church. Rosselfossil (talk) 00:45, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

— Rosselfossil (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Keep. It is notable. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 01:19, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Bookworm857158367 started the article as a one sentence stub. Racepacket (talk) 13:09, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Dakota-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:31, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Finding news sources, but it seems this church's biggest claim to fame is it's association with Fr. Ryan St. Anne Scott, a "rogue" priest. However, if that meets WP:CHURCH #6 (it need not be a positive formative impact), then keepVulture19 (talk) 01:37, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT My mistake, WP:CHURCH is not a guideline. Vulture19 (talk) 01:39, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Incidental mention in the Ryan St. Anne Scott controversy is not significant coverage for establishing notabiliy. I don't see non-local coverage of it as an institution. Racepacket (talk) 06:48, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Powers Lake, North Dakota, where it is: this is usually a good solution for local churches. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:27, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 01:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: There are certainly G-News articles concerning Scott that mention this church, but as we all know, notability is not transferrable. Are there reliable sources about this church, as WP:V requires? I don't see any. RGTraynor 13:40, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to the place where it is. Polarpanda (talk) 13:41, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.