Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silat Sunda Institute

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 23:25, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Silat Sunda Institute (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Martial arts organization created in 2012. The article's "sources" predate the organization by over 30 years. There is no significant coverage for this organization. I'm not saying the underlying arts are not notable, but this organization is.Mdtemp (talk) 16:16, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 16:44, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There is no coverage of this school. The fact that the article barely mentions the school is a bit confusing. The article's focus appears to be on the arts themselves without making any real claims of notability or giving supporting evidence. I made some comments on the article's talk page, but there's nothing to show this particular school meets WP:GNG or WP:MANOTE. Papaursa (talk) 20:42, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This article confused me quite a bit but based on the above observations it seems to refer to a single recently created non-notable school. Alternatively large portions of the article are a direct copy from Gadjah Putih Jati Wisesa. It may essentially be the same thing (hard to tell for sure but a renaming?) and could be deleted as Db-same.Peter Rehse (talk) 20:50, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - searches showed nothing notable. Onel5969 TT me 17:24, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.