Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singpatong Sitnumnoi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Michig (talk) 09:13, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Singpatong Sitnumnoi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails general notability guidelines due to lack of non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications. Steps were taken WP:BEFORE this nomination to locate said sources, but were unsuccessful. Please do not hesitate to contact me should evidence of such coverage come forward during this discussion. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 01:14, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:05, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:06, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:06, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lacks the significant independent coverage required to meet WP:GNG. The camp can't inherit notability from any of its fighters--it needs coverage specifically about it. Papaursa (talk) 01:09, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The camp is covered in this column article from the 18 March 2015 issue of Kom Chad Luek, a nationally circulated newspaper. --Paul_012 (talk) 10:03, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG with a lack of significant independent coverage. My computer couldn't translate the article mentioned by Paul012, but even if that article is a good source the article needs more than one.Mdtemp (talk) 19:56, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG.--Donniediamond (talk) 13:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.