Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sky Piercer
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete per discussion. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 19:23, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
- Sky Piercer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant independent coverage to show GNG is met.Mdtemp (talk) 15:32, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 16:33, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- DeleteThis is a name of a particular weapon in a fictional novel. No reason to have its own article when Ji (polearm) exists.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:33, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with the previous comments. The bottom line is that there is no significant independent coverage to show WP:GNG is met. Papaursa (talk) 02:32, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:06, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:06, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:06, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment, there are articles on fictional weapons ie. Sting (Middle-earth) but that weapon is notable with references while this is not and have been unable to find references, doesn't meet WP:GNG so delete, also not mentioned in articles on Lü Bu or Ji (polearm) as deemed trivial? Coolabahapple (talk) 17:41, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.