Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spider-Man (set index)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Alternative versions of Spider-Man. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:48, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Spider-Man (set index)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a duplication of material presented elsewhere. This is already covered in better detail in Alternative versions of Spider-Man#Other Spider-Men and Women in the Marvel Universe. It serves no real purpose to stand alone. The disambiguation page is just about as useful. Spidey104 12:54, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Alternative versions of Spider-Man per nomination. Fortdj33 (talk) 14:52, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom. We don't need this redunancy. Doczilla _{@SUPERHEROLOGIST} 19:11, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - per nom. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 20:55, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I guess a merge would be better than a deletion. Spidey104 00:02, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.