Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stafford Sri Lankan School Doha

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 21:38, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stafford Sri Lankan School Doha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A search indicates that this topic is probably not notable. Izno (talk) 21:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 08:39, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 08:39, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Qatar-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 08:42, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as a secondary school per longstanding precedent and consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:40, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - We keep high schools because experience shows that, with enough research, sources can almost invariably be found that meet WP:ORG. Google is a poor tool for finding sources on schools in the Indian sub-continent. Very few have much of an Internet presence. We need to avoid systemic bias and allow time for local hard-copy and local language sources to be investigated. Just Chilling (talk) 22:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I do see problems with the wording of the article (tagged it for "peacock" language), but it otherwise meets my standards. Bearian (talk) 15:38, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - I don't see anything that doesn't meet the standards for deletion. AlphaBetaGammaDeltaEpsilonZeta 12:46, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.