Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Staub (cookware)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) --Regards, MrScorch6200 (talk · contribs) 18:04, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Staub (cookware)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stub article for a product with little notability on its own, part of a larger company. Did a redirect to the larger company but it was reverted. Mrfrobinson (talk) 15:07, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As written, substub that fails Wikipedia:Notability (products). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 16:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:18, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:19, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:19, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep Very notable and influential cookware line used by some of France's most famous chefs (Paul Bocuse for example). Notability does not expire, and even if production of the line has ceased, it is still a notable subject. Sources include articles such as this one in New YOrk Magazine. Many more sources in French. And the company's website is helpful as well. Candleabracadabra (talk) 19:50, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Passes WP:GNG. Source examples include: [1], [2] (in French), [3], [4], [5], [6]. Northamerica1000^(talk) 22:56, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:48, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.