Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stoic Bliss

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:05, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stoic Bliss

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A music duo that doesn't seem to pass the requirements of WP:NBAND. Although the article claims to have some renown, I'm not finding any sources to support these assertations. There are only two sources in the article. One of which is a press release via Word Press, and so, of course, is not a reliable source. The only other source is a band profile page from a website that may or may count as a reliable source, but regardless, it alone is not enough to establish notability. Doing the usual searches turned up nothing of use that I could find. I initially tagged it for Speedy Deletion, however, that was turned down due to the article's assertation of notability, so I brought it here for consensus. Rorshacma (talk) 17:05, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added many references of national & international article written on Stoic Bliss but I don't understand why it's still on the speedy delation list? Did you checked all the 10 references that been added last night? Please re-check & cancel the deletation proposal.--58.97.175.35 (talk) 08:53, 6 July 2012 (UTC)360Lamp[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:17, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:17, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 17:17, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — TheSpecialUser ^(TSU) 14:41, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 16:16, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.