Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subramaniam Mohanadas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 08:21, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Subramaniam Mohanadas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about my father. We don't want an article about our family on Wikipidia. This is our privacy. Thank you, Front Door Man (talk) 00:57, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as no valid reason for deletion, Anyone can nominate an article for deletion claiming to be a relative .... Plus he may not want the article deleted anyway? –Davey2010 • (talk) 01:03, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete May not satisfy the notability guideline for academics. See the reference in the article discussing political influence and lack of qualification: [1]. Edison (talk) 22:04, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Vice-chancellor of a university (that's the head of a university in Commonwealth countries, equivalent to the president in the USA). Of course he's notable. Meets WP:NACADEMICS #6. No valid reason given for deletion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:03, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
'Keep unquestioned keep--head of a university. The level of his performance and the possible basis of his appointment are irrelevant. DGG ( talk ) 18:08, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As per DGG and Necrothesp. Clearly meets WP:NACADEMICS. The subject was the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Jaffna.His appointment and qualification are controversial but the notability is unquestionable .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:23, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nominator's reason for requesting deletion isn't a valid one and notability is established according to WP:NACADEMICS.--obi2canibe^{talk contr} 15:50, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.